amige. vs
Originality.ai.
| amige. | Originality.ai | |
|---|---|---|
| founded | 2026 | November 2022, by Jon Gillham + Conor Watt (bootstrapped) |
| modalities | image · video · text | text only |
| free tier | 3 scans / day | none (PAYG starts $30 for 3,000 credits) |
| entry paid plan | $9 / month (Pass) | $14.95 / month (Pro, monthly billing) |
| API | no public API (yet) | yes, via Enterprise ($179 / month) |
| self-reported accuracy | no single headline number | 99% Lite, 99%+ Turbo (single-vendor) |
| RAID benchmark | n/a (not text-only) | ranked #1, ~85% average across 11 models |
| plagiarism + fact-check | no | yes, bundled |
| model attribution | yes | no |
| per-detector breakdown | yes (panel of classifiers shown per scan) | no (single model) |
looking for a Originality.ai alternative?
Originality.ai is the most credentialed text-detection product in the category: ranked #1 on the RAID benchmark at roughly 85% average accuracy and 96.7% on paraphrased AI content (672,000-text independent evaluation across 11 AI models and 11 generation strategies). founded late 2022 by Jon Gillham, an ex-content-marketing-agency founder, specifically to flag AI text for content teams that pay freelancers and need to verify human authorship. bootstrapped, not VC-funded.
that RAID result is the strongest benchmark anyone in this category has, and you should weight it accordingly when you're thinking about text in particular.
amige. covers a different shape of the problem: non-text modalities, model attribution, plus a panel that routes each scan, names the likely maker (looks like, not is), and returns uncertain rather than guessing, at a price point built for a person rather than a content agency.
where Originality.ai is stronger
independent benchmark validation. RAID #1 is hard-earned. their reported 4.79% false-positive rate (independent) is higher than their marketed 1%, but still leads the category. if you're a publisher who has to make a call on a freelance article and you need to defend that call in a meeting, Originality's benchmark trail is the strongest paper anywhere.
plagiarism and fact-check, bundled. their product does AI detection plus plagiarism comparison plus a fact-check layer plus readability and grammar scoring. amige. does AI detection. if you're running a content team, the integrated workflow saves real time.
publisher-grade tooling. bulk scans, full-site scans, WordPress plugin, Chrome extension, team management. these are unsexy features that matter at scale. amige. doesn't ship them.
multilingual. Originality has a published multilingual model with reported 97.8% on their internal evaluation set. amige.'s text detection is English-focused today.
Originality is text-only. for any non-essay use case, it has no coverage.
where amige. is stronger
image and video. Originality.ai is text-only. amige. handles images (Midjourney, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, GPT-4o image, Flux, Ideogram), video (with frame-level scoring), and deepfake-specific signals. for any non-essay use case, Originality has no coverage.
model attribution. Originality says AI-generated; amige. says looks like Midjourney v6, 71% confidence, second guess DALL-E 3 at 14%. when you need to explain a verdict to a skeptic, the generator name gives you something to point at.
per-detector breakdown. amige.'s panel shows independent classifiers' scores side by side. when they agree, the headline is loud. when they disagree, the spread shows where confidence is low. Originality is a single model.
consumer pricing and free tier. Originality has no free tier. PAYG starts at $30 for 3,000 credits, where 1 credit = 100 words. for a curious person who wants to check one social-media image, that's heavy friction. amige.'s 3 scans per day, $0, no signup, gets you to an answer immediately.
accuracy: what the benchmarks show
Originality.ai is the only commercial detector to publish a clearly-defensible third-party benchmark lead. that's real. their marketed 99% drops to ~85% in RAID's real-world cross- generator setting, and their marketed 1% false-positive rate measured closer to 4.79% in the same evaluation. their ESL false- positive rate has been reported as high as 12 to 30 percent in third-party studies, depending on the source. they've published a thoughtful response.
amige. doesn't headline a single accuracy number. our framing is the whole machine: it routes each scan to the detectors strongest for it, a panel of independent detectors built by different teams weighs in, the reads are fused and calibrated, the maker is named as a best guess, and an explicit uncertain middle band beats a forced call. the full walkthrough lives on the machine. for the text case specifically, Originality's benchmark trail is stronger than any single-number claim we could make. we'd rather you read the breakdown than trust a percentage.
scanning a whole site at once
Originality.ai is built to audit at scale. its Site Scan checks an entire website for AI and plagiarism in one pass, and the Bulk Scanner runs a batch of documents together, the shape a publishing team auditing freelancer work needs. amige. is built for the one-off question.
who each is for
pick Originality.ai if you run a content team, publish for SEO, hire freelance writers, or sell editorial services. you want plagiarism + AI + fact-check + grammar in one product. you want the RAID benchmark on your slide. you want the WordPress plugin and the bulk site scan. you're used to paying $15 per seat per month.
pick amige. if you want to check an image, a video, or a text quickly. you want the verdict broken down by detector and attributed to a specific model. you don't want a content-team SaaS. you want a $9 plan with a free tier and a shareable permalink.
if you're an editor running AI checks on freelance text, Originality is the right tool. if you're trying to figure out whether a TikTok is real, Originality has no coverage.
questions
Is Originality.ai worth it?
For content teams and publishers checking freelance text, yes. Originality.ai ranked #1 on the RAID benchmark at roughly 85% average accuracy and bundles plagiarism, fact-checking, and a WordPress plugin. It’s text-only with no free tier, so a curious person checking one image or video gets nothing from it.
Does Originality.ai check images or video?
no. Originality.ai detects AI text only. amige. handles image, video, and text, names the likely generator, and shows multiple classifier scores per scan. for any non-text check, Originality.ai has no coverage.
Is amige. or Originality.ai more accurate for text?
Originality.ai has the stronger text record. Its RAID #1 result is the best independent benchmark in the category, though its marketed 99% drops to about 85% in cross-generator testing and its 1% false-positive claim measured closer to 4.79%. amige. doesn’t publish one number and leans on per-detector transparency instead.
Does Originality.ai have a free tier?
No ongoing free plan. Pay-as-you-go starts at $30 for 3,000 credits, where one credit covers 100 words, and the entry subscription runs about $14.95 per month. amige. gives 3 free scans per day with no signup and a $9 paid plan.
sources.
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05Axis Intelligence — RAID benchmark roundup (2026 detector review)Independent third-party comparison; Originality.ai ranked #1 on RAID.
- 06NIU Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning — AI detectors: an ethical minefieldIndependent FPR analysis across detectors.