amige: AI image & video detector. check if an image, video or text is AI-generated. is it real? or is it?

image, video, or text, amige. reads it against every model that matters, names what made it, and never fakes certainty.

drop a photo, video,
or chunk of text.
drop it here
jpg · png · webp · gif · heic
mp4 · webm · mov  up to 15mb
+
or paste text instead↓ instant verdict
// tungtung.jpg
likely ai99%
// starry_night.jpg
likely human92%
// T-800.jpg
uncertain/
AI enhanced?
54%
// 💀.mp4
likely ai99%
← swipe to see more →
midjourneysoragptgeminifluxdall·emidjourneysoragptgeminifluxdall·emidjourneysoragptgeminifluxdall·e
veostable diffusionnano bananarunwayveostable diffusionnano bananarunwayveostable diffusionnano bananarunway
grokideogrampikaklingfireflygrokideogrampikaklingfireflygrokideogrampikaklingfirefly
90+generative models,
one place

one scan, any medium

image, video, or text — checked against 90+ generative models in one place.

looks like midjourney v6
best guess · 71%
gpt-4o image22%
gemini · imagen7%

names the maker

not just “it’s AI.” amige. says which model it resembles, when it’s confident.

a panel, not a guess

amige. routes each scan to the detectors strongest for it, then fuses them into one verdict. disagreement shown, never averaged away.

71%
never 0%uncertainnever 100%

honest by design

every read is a probability, never a proof. it tells you how sure it is, and says “uncertain” rather than guess.

many minds.
one honest call.

a scan is read, routed, weighed by a panel, then fused & calibrated — landing on a probability, never a proof. watch one go through.

how it works, in full →
↳ one scan, start to finish.
↳ one scan, start to finish.

How an amige. scan works, step by step. First, the content you drop — an image, video, or text — is read for signal. Before any verdict, amige. takes two quick looks that guide the scan but never score it: a routing hint that points toward the detectors most likely to read this kind of content well, and a novelty check that notices when something is unusual so the engine treads more carefully. The novelty check only flags that the content is unusual; it never claims what made it, and it is not a new-generator detector. Next, a panel of independent detectors — built by different teams on different data — each weigh in on their own. They do not all agree, and the disagreement is kept on display, not averaged away. Their readings are then fused and calibrated into a single estimate: combining only tempers confidence, it never inflates it, and the result is capped so a verdict never reads 0 percent or 100 percent. The outcome is one of three honest calls — likely AI, likely human, or uncertain — always a probability, never a proof. When the panel splits or the content is unusual, amige. holds the verdict back as uncertain rather than guess. The readings shown in the animation are illustrative of a single scan and are not accuracy claims.

it's real?
or is it?

← image or amige? there's only one way to find out.
  1. 01
    drop it
    image · video · text. up to 15mb. heic + mov welcome.
  2. 02
    let amige. detect
    likely ai or likely human, across 90+ models from midjourney to gpt-4o to nano banana.
  3. 03
    every model, every number
    not an average. ranked side-by-side so you see the reasoning, not just the verdict.
the screenshot product ↓
we wrote it down ↓browse all →